It has nothing to do with statistics, but the Higgs Boson story has been the most exciting news I’ve heard in a while. Physics was always my favorite of the sciences, and it’s nice to see hard science reporting make major headlines.
Author: bs king
4th of July, Census Bureau style
Here’s hoping everyone had a relaxing 4th of July!
Today I learned that the White House sponsors two official Independence Day parties at the White House. One of them is for service men and women and their families, the other is for a broader group of friends of the White House. I bring this up because apparently my younger brother finagled a ticket to the second one. Kind of makes my day feel a little lame, but hey, at least the house is coming along, and I’m the most relaxed I have been in a while.
I was looking for some good stats about the White House, but then I found this which I thought was equally interesting. It’s no West Lawn Party….but we here at Bad Data Bad do what we can with what we have.
Without further ado, here’s some (year old) fun facts, courtesy of our Census Bureau:
The Fourth of July 2011
2.5 million
Source: Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970
<http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/statab.html>
311.7 million
Source: Population clock <http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html>
Flags
$3.2 million
Source: Foreign Trade Statistics <http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/www/>
<http://www.usatradeonline.gov>
$486,026
Source: Foreign Trade Statistics <http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/www/>
<http://www.usatradeonline.gov>
$302.7 million
Source: 2007 Economic Census, Series EC0731SP1, Products and Services Code 3149998231
<http://www.census.gov/econ/census07/>
Fireworks
$190.7 million
Source: Foreign Trade Statistics <http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/www>
<http://www.usatradeonline.gov>
$231.8 million
Source: 2007 Economic Census, Series EC0731SP1, Products and Services Code 325998J108
<http://www.census.gov/econ/census07/>
Patriotic-Sounding Place Names
Early Presidential Last Names
138
Source: Census 2000 Genealogy <http://www.census.gov/genealogy/www/freqnames2k.html>
The British are Coming!
$98.3 billion
Source: Foreign Trade Statistics <http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top1012yr.html#total>
<http://www.usatradeonline.gov>
Fourth of July Cookouts
More than 1 in 4
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/HogsPigs/HogsPigs-03-25-2011.pdf>
6.8 billion pounds
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/MeatAnimPr/MeatAnimPr-04-28-2011.pdf>
6
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/PoulProdVa/PoulProdVa-04-28-2011.pdf>
Over 1 in 3
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CropProdSu/CropProdSu-01-12-2011_new_format.pdf> and
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-01-27-2011.pdf>
Please Pass the Potato
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CropProdSu/CropProdSu-01-12-2011_new_format.pdf>
More than three-fourths
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-01-27-2011.pdf>
7 in 10
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-01-27-2011.pdf>
Florida
Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
<http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-01-27-2011_new_format.pdf>
81 million
Source: Mediamark Research & Intelligence, as cited in the Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2011
<http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/>, Table 1239
Useful knowledge for a day in the sun
A midweek day off during a heat wave? Time to go outside!
Spanking and Mental Trauma
The headline reads “Spanking Linked to Mental Illness“, and I was immediately intrigued. Spanking, generally, is a very hard thing to study, as it is so often correlated with other things. Physical punishment of children is often linked to frustrated and under resourced parents, cultural norms that can be positive or negative, and even immigration status.
Curious how the study authors controlled for such things, but assured by the article that they had, I flipped over to the study itself. It didn’t take long for me to realize this was yet another example of bad journalism mucking about with a half decent study.
The article starts like this:
Although the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) strongly discourages spanking, at leasthalf of parents admit to physically punishing their children. Some research suggests that as many as 70-90 percent of mothers have resorted to spanking at one time or another. Anew study published in the journal Pediatrics may cause parents to think more carefully before laying a hand on their little ones.
However, the study states:
Physical punishment was assessed with the question, “As a child how often were you ever pushed, grabbed, shoved, slapped or hit by your parents or any adult living in your house?” Respondents who reported an answer of“sometimes” or greater to this event were considered as having experienced harsh physical punishment. The term harsh physicalpunishment was used for this study because the measure includes acts of physical force beyond slapping, which some may consider more severe than “customary” physical punishment (ie, spanking).
So the study specifically excluded “customary” physical punishment when it assessed the effects on future mental illness….which pretty much completely contradicts the headline. I also doubt this is what 70-90% of mother’s are admitting to when they spank “at one time or another”.
Irresponsible.
The SCOTUS and perception of statistics
Finally got internet in the new house. Can’t complain too much….the guy finished running the wire to our house even though a thunderstorm started. Clearly that man was getting paid by the job, not the hour.
Anyway, had an interesting chat with my father (a lawyer) after our closing on Thursday about the Supreme Court ruling on health care. He mentioned that a coworker was griping that the Supreme Court meant nothing any more because they only voted on party lines. My father, being the good data accuracy man that he is, quickly dissented.
He looked it up, and asserted that nearly half of the decisions last year were unanimous. For this year, 7-2 votes were the least common (8%), then 8-1 (11%), 6-3 (17%) and then 5-4 (20%). So overall, they agree nearly as much as they disagree, and they are only completely divided on about 1 in 5 cases. Kennedy and Roberts voted with the majority over 90% of the time. Ginsburg was the least likely to vote in the majority. Lots of interesting stats to be run on this, another good breakdown of some of the data is here.
It seems the perception that every vote is political is heavily skewed by the very few court cases most of us hear about every year. I would wager even highly political citizens probably couldn’t rattle off more than a handful. When you break down the 5-4 decisions exclusively, about 2/3rds of them vote down ideological lines…..which totals to about 10 cases for 2011.
This kind of skewing of perception is common when a few high profile events dramatically overshadow regular operations. Thanks Dad, for pointing that out.
Big day
To be honest, my day was dominated by big news that had nothing to do with healthcare…..we closed on our house today (the one we were buying….we closed our sale yesterday).
Conspiracy theories and replicatability
I’m working on a theory around how many conspiracy theories a reasonable person is allowed to buy in to in their lifetime while still being completely normal. My current thought is you’re allowed at least 3 during your teenage years, and then one every 5 – 10 years after.
When I say conspiracy theories, I will mention that I’m only including ones that do not actually change your daily life in a significant way.
Conspiracy theories in general are a fantastic study of selective data interpretation. All of them do it in different ways, but there are some general themes. One of them was illustrated quite entertainingly by xkcd.com this morning:
To note: I never disbelieved the moon landing, but my (normally rational) little brother did for about 3 weeks one summer after watching a documentary on TV. He’s now a high school science teacher, for what it’s worth.
Causes of death and perception skewing
My first job out of college was working in one of the busiest Emergency Departments in the country. I learned a lot of interesting things about human behavior there, and some random facts about the way the ED interacts with the government as far as reporting goes.
Arizona Immigration and fake statistics
In case you haven’t heard, the Supreme Court ruled on Arizona’s immigration law today.
I was not surprised to see this show up on some of the feminist blogs I read, as they generally have a pro-immigration slant, but I was more than a little surprised to see that Amanda Marcotte considers this a women’s issue.
In a blog post for the XX blog on Slate.com, she argues that the laws surrounding checking IDs will likely result in racial profiling (certainly) and probably target the young (highly likely) but that this will also target women more than men (wait, huh?).
Her reasoning:
…..women, especially in poor or rural communities, are also much more likely to be out and about without legal identification than men, especially if they don’t drive or drive often. Women that are poor or undereducated are much more likely to be stay-at-home mothers with few resources, which makes it very easy to let concerns about up-to-date licenses or ID slip, especially if you don’t drive a car much because someone else in the household is using it for work. If your daily life is dedicated to running errands for your family, you may not have much cause to worry about keeping all your papers in order generally, until it’s too late and you’re finding yourself in jail for not being able to prove citizenship on the spot.
A few comments:
- I have searched for 20 minutes for any study or proof that women leave the house without their ID more often than men. I can’t find it. Maybe the idea is that women walk around more than men?
- Women that are poor and undereducated are not more likely to be stay at home mothers. 56% of SAHM have at least some college education or more.
- I can’t find any hard data on which gender lets their license expire more often, but I also can’t find proof that it’s women.
Life goes on, and so does life expectancy
Life expectancy is a funny thing. It’s a pretty often quoted statistic that not many people realize is just that – a statistic. It’s also fairly misunderstood, in that many people presume it’s static.
Truthfully, your life expectancy changes over the course of your life based on how long you’ve already lived. Most people accept this as making sense once it’s pointed out, but it’s not often the first thought people have when they here it (and journalist’s are ABYSMAL at clarifying the “at birth” part of most life expectancy estimates). Anyway, this week chartporn.org posted this chart, which I think illustrates the changes nicely. I didn’t check all the other data they put on there (though I was surprised to see how low the median age for first divorces is), but I thought the overall affect was quite informative.
In particular, I like the beginning of the chart, where it shows that if you make it beyond your first year, you actually get a bump up pretty quickly. Infant mortality is not often thought of as affecting overall life expectancy in developed countries, but it does.





